My Playbook
HERO =========================== -->
Home Toolkit Manager Relationship & Leadership Style Micromanagement Framework
MICROMANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Diagnose the pattern, then choose moves that restore control without a blow-up

Micromanagement is rarely “just a personality”. It’s usually a control system: visibility demands, decision capture, and trust erosion. Identify the type of micromanager you’re dealing with, then respond in ways that protect delivery, credibility, and energy.
Related Categories
Clarity, Priorities & Direction Expectations, Burnout & Capacity Workplace Dynamics and Politics

When to Use This Framework

  • When your autonomy is shrinking and “updates” have become constant surveillance.
  • When decisions are repeatedly reopened, rewritten, or rerouted through your manager.
  • When you’re working harder but delivering less, because control friction is eating time.
  • When you can feel your confidence changing (second-guessing, over-explaining, hesitating).
  • When you need to stabilise the situation without escalating into a formal conflict.

Pro Tips

  • Don’t “win the argument”. Build an operating rhythm that makes micromanagement unnecessary.
  • Use structure as a shield: clear plans, clear checkpoints, and clean decision records.
  • Never fight for autonomy with emotion. Ask for it with delivery controls.
  • Track patterns, not vibes: what’s happening, how often, and what it impacts.
  • If the behaviour becomes punitive or reputation-damaging, switch to protection mode early.

Micromanagement Signals Checklist

I’m asked for frequent “quick updates” that don’t change decisions, they mainly prove I’m working.
My manager rewrites my work or messaging, even when the original is correct and fit for purpose.
Decisions get pulled back to my manager “for review” after I’ve already agreed them with stakeholders.
I’m required to copy them into everything, or get approval for routine actions that shouldn’t need it.
Feedback focuses on style, wording, or “tone”, more than outcomes or impact.
They ask for status even when we agreed a checkpoint, as if they can’t tolerate unknowns.
I’m not allowed to present my own work; they speak for it, then send me to “action it”.
They manage optics aggressively, who gets credit, who gets access, and what gets seen.
Work keeps being “refined” with no clear definition of done, it turns into endless iteration.
They use policy/process language to control behaviour (e.g., “compliance”, “standards”), rather than coaching.
My judgement is questioned in public (subtle undermining, “just checking”, or “are you sure?”).
I’m burning extra hours because control friction creates rework, delays, and anxiety loops.

Your Micromanagement Snapshot

Your score reflects how strongly micromanagement is showing up as a system (visibility demands, decision capture, trust erosion and rework). A higher score doesn’t automatically mean “malicious”, it means the control pattern is materially affecting delivery and needs a structured response.

Micromanagement Intensity Score
0%
Low Moderate High
Visibility Control 0%
Decision Capture 0%
Trust Erosion 0%
Burnout Pressure 0%
Status: Saved to My Playbook

Your Smart Micromanagement Summary

Based on your Micromanagement Intensity Score of 0%

This summary identifies the manager pattern most consistent with what you selected, then gives moves that restore control without turning it into a personality war.

Likely manager pattern

Manager type
How to deal with it

    Risk flags in your situation

    What to do next

    Recommended tools to support you

    Closure: lock your next 7 days

    Your goal now is simple: reduce control friction while increasing confidence signals. Do it with a clean operating rhythm, crisp decision records, and predictable checkpoints, not confrontation.

      My Playbook

      Saved items

      You haven’t saved anything yet. Use Save on tools you want quick access to.

        Quick links
        The Dashboard The Lens The Toolkit The Coach
        My Playbook